George Loffhagen vs Zura Tkemaladze Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 May at 09:40 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Loffhagen vs Z. Tkemaladze

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GEO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Loffhagen 1 - 0 Tkemaladze
They have played 2 sets in total, with George Loffhagen winning 2 and Zura Tkemaladze winning 0. The last match between George Loffhagen and Zura Tkemaladze was at the Tbilisi Challenger, 21-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with George Loffhagen getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loffhagen | 1 |
| Tkemaladze | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Tbilisi Challenger(05-21-25)
G. Loffhagen vs Z. Tkemaladze H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $48,115 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.63% (201-110) | Career Total W/L | 45.07% (128-156) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
G. Loffhagen vs Z. Tkemaladze Match Preview:
- Recent performances over the last 6 months indicate that Loffhagen has a second serve success rate of 47.89%, significantly higher than Tkemaladze's 35.66%.
- In return games, Tkemaladze edges out slightly by winning 44.96% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Loffhagen's 42.2%.
- How do their first serve returns compare? Loffhagen captures 21.88% whereas Tkemaladze closely follows at 21.39%.
- When under pressure, Loffhagen excels, saving 56.62% of breakpoints, whereas Tkemaladze saves 50.98%.
- Over the past year, Loffhagen boasts a win rate of 75%, contrasting with Tkemaladze's 42.5% match victory rate.
- Both players find hard courts as their favored surface; Loffhagen has a superior 69% win rate, while Tkemaladze holds a 51% win rate.
- Who competes better on the Futures/ITF circuit? Loffhagen wins 77.36% of his matches, markedly higher than Tkemaladze’s 42.31%.
- Regarding the quality of opponents faced, Loffhagen has encountered an average ranked player of 430.89, slightly tougher than Tkemaladze’s average of 435.55.
- In deciding sets, Loffhagen wins 63%, a clear advantage over Tkemaladze’s 33% success rate.
- Loffhagen's recent form shows a breakpoint conversion rate of 28.57%, surpassing Tkemaladze's 22.73%.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head statistics highlight some clear advantages and potential vulnerabilities in the upcoming match between Loffhagen and Tkemaladze. Loffhagen shows considerable strength in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, both key areas crucial for maintaining match control.
Tkemaladze, while adept at returning, particularly excels in capturing opponent serve points, but may struggle with decision-making in high-pressure moments, as reflected in his lower breakpoint save percentage.
Loffhagen's overall match win rate and performance on hard courts provide an additional layer of confidence, suggesting that his consistency and competitiveness could overpower Tkemaladze's efforts.
Given these insights, Loffhagen appears most likely to secure a victory in their upcoming encounter, capitalizing on his recent form and ability to handle critical points effectively.
George Loffhagen vs Zura Tkemaladze Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Loffhagen vs Z. Tkemaladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:14:14 | Average Match Time | 1:14:14 |
| 69% (22/32) | 1st Serve % | 57% (27/47) |
| 95% (21/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 70% (7/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (27/47) | Return Points Win % | 13% (4/32) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Loffhagen Recent Matches Played
Z. Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played

G. Loffhagen vs Z. Tkemaladze Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.63% (201/110) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.07% (128/156) |
| 64.06% (451/253) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.52% (301/346) |
| 55.73% (3643/2894) | Games Win/Loss | 48.62% (2956/3124) |
| 68.63% (105/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.21% (93/96) |
| 57.58% (38/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 37.80% (31/51) |
| 70.83% (51/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 35.00% (7/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1279 | Aces Total | 247 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 775 | Total Double Faults | 676 |
| 1:28:34 | Average Match Time | 1:28:19 |
| 424.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.06 |
| 61% (10045/16496) | 1st Serve % | 64% (10032/15611) |
| 71% (7181/10045) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6219/10032) |
| 53% (3398/6451) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2696/5582) |
| 43% (815/1887) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (704/1640) |
| 41% (7363/17754) | Return Points Win % | 41% (6229/15201) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (9/15) |
| 66.54% (181/91) | Futures W/L | 46.64% (118/135) |
| 66% (200/303) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (123/276) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (46/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (37/71) |
| 44% (37/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (35/83) |
| 86% (220/189) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (146/116) |
| 13% (220/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (146/30) |
| 14% (91/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (138/11) |